Background: This cross-sectional study was performed with the aim of determining the prevalence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection among acute hepatitis patients attending a tertiary care teaching hospital in a developing country and to determine the relative performance of prevalent diagnostic assays in establishing its diagnosis.
Materials and methods: A total of 46 adult patients were included in this study, all of whom presented with jaundice of <4 weeks' duration and elevation of AST and ALT above 500 U/L. The prevalence of HEV among patients with acute hepatitis was calculated on the basis of the proportion of recruited patients reacting positively in serum anti-HEV immunoglobulin M (IgM) and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays.
Results: Among the recruited patients, 11 (23.91%) and 15 (32.6%) patients were positive for anti-HEV IgM and RT-PCR, respectively. The two tests demonstrated poor inter-test agreement, thereby implying the necessity of performing both tests for reliable diagnosis of acute HEV virus infection. We also observed a significant difference in the duration of illness between RT-PCR positive and negative patients (P = 0.008). The mean (±SD) duration of illness in the two groups was 8.6 (±3.50) and 11.66 (± 5.15) days, respectively. Combining the results of IgM ELISA and RT-PCR, we observed that 23 out of 46 patients (50%) had evidence of acute HEV virus infection among our patients.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that HEV is the commonest cause of acute hepatitis in adult patients attending a tertiary care teaching hospital and that the diagnostic algorithm for its confirmation should include both IgM ELISA and RT-PCR assays.
Keywords: Anti-HEV IgM ELISA; RT-PCR; hepatitis A; hepatitis B; hepatitis E.