The effects of a novel direct-fed microbial (DFM) on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, digestibility, ruminal morphology, and volatile fatty acid (VFA) profile of finishing steers were evaluated. Single-source Angus-crossbred yearling steers (n = 144; initial body weight (BW) = 371 ± 19 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design. Steers were blocked by initial BW and randomly assigned to treatments (12 pens/treatment; 4 steers/pen). Treatments included (A) CONTROL (no DFM, tylosin, or monensin, (B) MONTY (monensin sodium [330 mg/animal-daily] and tylosin phosphate [90 mg/animal-daily]), and (C) MONPRO (monensin sodium [same as previous] and Lactobacillus salivarius L28 [1 × 106 CFU/animal-daily]). Treatments were included in a steam-flaked corn-based finisher diet offered once daily using a clean-bunk management for ~149 d. The digestibility assessment was performed from days 70 to 74. Ruminal fluid and rumen tissue samples were collected at the slaughter for VFA profile and papillae morphology analyses, respectively. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS with pen serving as the experimental unit, treatment as fixed effect, and BW block as random effect. Steers offered MONPRO had on average 5.3% less (P < 0.01) dry matter intake (9.56 kg/d) compared with either CONTROL (10.16 kg/d) or MONTY (9.96 kg/d). The carcass-adjusted final BW (613 kg; P = 0.23), overall average daily gain (1.64 kg/d; P = 0.23), and gain-efficiency (0.165; P = 0.61) were not affected by treatments. Steers offered CONTROL had greater (P < 0.01) marbling score and tended (P = 0.06) to have less carcasses grading Select and tended (P = 0.10) to have more carcasses grading Upper-Choice, while other carcass characteristics and liver-abscesses were not affected (P ≥ 0.23) by treatments. The digestibility of nutrients (P ≥ 0.13) and the ruminal VFA profile (P ≥ 0.12) were not affected by treatments. Steers offered MONPRO tended (P = 0.09) to have 16% greater average papillae number compared to other treatments. Yearlings offered finishing diets containing L. salivarius L28 plus monensin did not affect growth performance, digestibility, or ruminal VFA, but reduced feed intake. Carcass quality was negatively affected by treatments, while animals consuming L. salivarius L28 and monensin tended to improve ruminal morphology. Current findings in ruminal morphology and feed intake may warrant further assessment of diets containing L. salivarius L28 on beef cattle food safety aspects.
Keywords: beef steers; carcass; direct-fed microbial; morphology; performance.
Antimicrobial resistance is a growing concern to public health and medically important antibiotics have been listed in the Veterinary Feed Directive. Nutritional technologies, such as direct-fed microbials, are being increasingly studied for the development of an effective use on beef cattle production systems. The newly isolated strain of Lactobacillus salivarius L28 has demonstrated pathogenic inhibition of Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes on in vitro assessments. The potential benefits have warranted the exploration of L. salivarius L28 in a feedlot setting. Single-source Angus-crossbred yearling steers were offered steam-flaked corn-based finishing diets containing no feed additive, or either a combination of tylosin plus monensin or L. salivarius L28 plus monensin. Steers offered L. salivarius L28 plus monensin consumed 5.3% less feed compared with other treatments, while other growth performance variables and the digestibility of nutrients were not affected. Carcasses from cattle supplemented with monensin had slightly lower carcass quality grades than those not supplemented with monensin. Lactobacillus salivarius L28 plus monensin tended to improve steers ruminal morphology. Current findings may warrant further food safety assessments when cattle are offered diets containing L. salivarius L28.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.