Implications of Sex Differences on the Treatment Effectiveness in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Related to Clinical Endpoints and Quality of Life

Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2024 Feb;21(1):43-52. doi: 10.1007/s11897-023-00638-6. Epub 2023 Dec 7.

Abstract

Purpose of the review: This narrative review will emphasize the necessity for more female enrollment in heart failure (HF) trials and proposes future investigations regarding optimal dosages. Ultimately, a deeper understanding of the unique pathophysiology and medication responses in both men and women is crucial for effective HF management and may improve the quality of life in women.

Recent findings: An analysis of 740 cardiovascular studies reveals that women make up only 38.2% of participants on average. Regarding to trials testing the effectiveness of HF medications, women's involvement are as low as 23.1%. While current guidelines lack sex-specific treatment recommendations, emerging research suggests differential medication dosages could be beneficial. Studies indicate that women may achieve comparable outcomes with lower doses of certain medications (angiotensin-receptor blockers) compared to men, signaling potential for more tailored dosing approaches. We advocate that the next step in HF research should prioritize the importance of tailoring treatment for HF patients by taking into account the variations in drug absorption and distribution among women.

Keywords: HFrEF; Heart failure; Men; QOL; Sex; Treatment; Women.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists / therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Heart Failure* / therapy
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Quality of Life
  • Sex Characteristics
  • Stroke Volume / physiology
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists