In nuclear disaster prevention, it is essential not only to make daily efforts to prevent accidents from occurring but also to properly apply lessons learnt from actual disasters. Although significant changes have been made to nuclear disaster preparedness in Japan since the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, there is insufficient information on whether these changes have been evaluated as practical and appropriate for the needs of the Japanese public. In this survey, 20 officials of the Cabinet Office and Japan Atomic Energy Agency, in charge of planning nuclear disaster prevention policy, were asked to evaluate the current nuclear disaster prevention plan through a questionnaire, and compare it with that before the accident, and indicate what elements are lacking in the current plan. The survey results revealed that 30% of the participants (six respondents) had a positive view of the enhancement of resources, including physical and human assets. However, as many as 60% (12 respondents) expressed negative sentiments, primarily due to perceived deficiencies in organisational measures, particularly the coordination of these resources. Moreover, the participants expressed keen interest in obtaining health data during evacuation, along with information on the physical and mental effects on evacuees living in evacuation centres. These crucial insights can inform the formulation of effective future preparedness plans for evacuation and radiation protection.
Keywords: nuclear disaster preparedness measures; nuclear disaster prevention; nuclear safety.
Creative Commons Attribution license.