Understanding the determinants of α-conotoxin (α-CTX) selectivity for different nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subtypes is a prerequisite for the design of tool compounds to study nAChRs. However, selectivity optimization of these small, disulfide-rich peptides is difficult not only because of an absence of α-CTX/nAChR co-structures but also because it is challenging to predict how a mutation to an α-CTX will alter its potency and selectivity. As a prototypical system to investigate selectivity, we employed the α-CTX LvIA that is 25-fold selective for the α3β2 nAChR over the related α3β4 nAChR subtype, which is a target for nicotine addiction. Using two-electrode voltage clamp electrophysiology, we identified LvIA[D11R] that is 2-fold selective for the α3β4 nAChR, reversing the subtype preference. This effect is specifically due to the change in charge and not shape of LvIA[D11R], as substitution of D11 with citrulline retains selectivity for the α3β2 nAChR. Furthermore, LvIA[D11K] shows a stronger reversal, with 4-fold selectivity for the α3β4 nAChR. Motivated by these findings, using site-directed mutagenesis, we found that β2[K79A] (I79 on β4), but not β2[K78A] (N78 on β4), largely restores the potency of basic mutants at position 11. Finally, to understand the structural basis of this effect, we used AlphaFold2 to generate models of LvIA in complex with both nAChR subtypes. Both models confirm the plausibility of an electrostatic mechanism to explain the data and also reproduce a broad range of potency and selectivity structure-activity relationships for LvIA mutants, as measured using free energy perturbation simulations. Our work highlights how electrostatic interactions can drive α-CTX selectivity and may serve as a strategy for optimizing the selectivity of LvIA and other α-CTXs.
Keywords: AlphaFold2; conotoxin; free energy perturbation; nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; peptide synthesis; selectivity.