Assessment of clinical and economic impact of rivaroxaban plus aspirin vs. aspirin alone as a secondary prophylaxis in patients with chronic and symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the United States

J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):10-15. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2290386. Epub 2023 Dec 9.

Abstract

Aim: The objective in this study was to assess the clinical and economic implications of the inclusion of rivaroxaban as a secondary prophylaxis in patients with chronic or symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) in the United States (US).

Methods: A cost-consequence model was adapted to evaluate the economic impact of rivaroxaban plus aspirin in a hypothetical 1-million-member health plan. The model inputs were taken from multiple sources: efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban + aspirin vs. aspirin alone were abstracted from COMPASS and VOYAGER randomized clinical trials; the prevalence of chronic and symptomatic PAD and incidence rates of clinical events (major adverse cardiac events [MACE], major adverse limb events [MALE], and major bleeding), were abstracted from the analysis of claims data; healthcare costs of clinical events and wholesale acquisition costs for rivaroxaban were abstracted from the literature and Red Book, respectively (2022 USD). One-way sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were also conducted.

Results: Over one year, with a 5% uptake of rivaroxaban, the model estimated rivaroxaban + aspirin to reduce 21 MACE/MALE events in the PAD patient population. The reduction in these clinical events offsets the increased risk of major bleeding (16 additional events), demonstrating a positive health benefit of the rivaroxaban addition. These benefits led to a $0.27 incremental cost per member per month (PMPM) to a US plan. The major driver of the incremental cost was the cost of rivaroxaban. In a subgroup of patients with the presence of any high-risk factor (heart failure, diabetes, renal insufficiency, or history of vascular disease affecting two or more vascular beds), the incremental PMPM cost was $0.13.

Conclusions: Rivaroxaban + aspirin was found to provide positive net clinical benefit on the annual number of MACE/MALE avoided, with a modest increase in the PMPM cost.

Keywords: Aspirin; D; D61; I; I1; I10; I12; cost-consequence analysis; major adverse cardiac events; major adverse limb events; peripheral artery disease; real-world evidence; rivaroxaban.

MeSH terms

  • Aspirin* / therapeutic use
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Factor Xa Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Hemorrhage / chemically induced
  • Humans
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease* / complications
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Rivaroxaban
  • United States

Substances

  • Aspirin
  • Rivaroxaban
  • Factor Xa Inhibitors
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors