Objectives: Simultaneous combinations of cognitive and physical exercises (cognitive-motor dual-task training [CMDT]) are more effective than physical and cognitive training alone in counteracting the decline of older adults and promoting physical and psychological well-being. The CMDT can be particularly effective in improving cognitive and functional abilities. Here, we validated an innovative nonpharmacologic intervention for anxiety and general well-being in older people by combining CMDT and response-generated feedback (RGF) principles. As outcomes, anxiety, cognitive functions, and functional mobility were evaluated. In addition, electroencephalographic methods were employed to investigate the neural basis of the possible intervention effects.
Methods: Thirty older adults were divided into an experimental group trained using a CMDT + RGF protocol and a control group using the CMDT only. The CMDT + RGF consisted of the simultaneous execution of whole-body exercises, cognitive tasks that were realized using interactive devices, and continuous feedback on every response.
Results: Results showed decreased anxiety and increased response speed in the experimental group, and both groups improved their functional ability and response accuracy after the intervention. According to electroencephalographic results, both groups showed an increase in the bilateral prefrontal cortex anticipatory activity, but the experimental group also showed a further increase in the left prefrontal cortex and in the premotor areas anticipatory functions.
Discussion: This study confirms the effectiveness of the proposed intervention on anxiety by adopting a nonpharmacology treatment that could affect public and individual health costs by proposing an alternative approach to expensive medications and psychotherapy and could significantly improve older adults' quality of life.
Keywords: Cognitive-motor anticipation; Event-related potential; Multicomponent training.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.