The combined effect of social pensions and cash transfers on child mortality: evaluating the last two decades in Brazil and projecting their mitigating effect during the global economic crisis

Temidayo James Aransiola; José Alejandro Ordoñez; Daniella Medeiros Cavalcanti; Gabriel Alves de Sampaio Morais; Dandara de Oliveira Ramos; Davide Rasella

doi:10.1016/j.lana.2023.100618

The combined effect of social pensions and cash transfers on child mortality: evaluating the last two decades in Brazil and projecting their mitigating effect during the global economic crisis

Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Nov 3:27:100618. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100618. eCollection 2023 Nov.

Authors

Temidayo James Aransiola¹, José Alejandro Ordoñez¹, Daniella Medeiros Cavalcanti¹, Gabriel Alves de Sampaio Morais¹, Dandara de Oliveira Ramos¹, Davide Rasella^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Institute of Collective Health (ISC) at the Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Bahia, Brazil.
² Institute of Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.

Abstract

Background: The world is currently experiencing multiple economic crises due to the COVID-19 pandemic, war in Ukraine, and inflation surge, which disproportionately affect children, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We evaluated if the expansion of Social Assistance, represented by Social Pensions (SP) and Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT), could reduce infant and child mortality, and mitigate excess deaths among children in Brazil, one of the LMICs most affected by these economic crises.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective impact evaluation in a cohort of Brazilian municipalities from 2004 to 2019 using multivariable fixed-effects negative binomial models, adjusted for relevant demographic, social, and economic factors, to estimate the effects of the SP and CCT on infant and child mortality. To verify the robustness of the results, we conducted several sensitivity and triangulation analyses, including difference-in-difference with propensity-score matching. These results were incorporated into dynamic microsimulation models to generate projections to 2030 of various economic crises and Social Assistance scenarios.

Findings: Consolidated coverage of SP was associated with significant reductions in infant and child mortality rates, with a rate ratio (RR) of 0.843 (95% CI: 0.826-0.861) and 0.840 (95% CI: 0.824-0.856), respectively. Similarly, CCT consolidated coverages showed RRs of 0.868 (95% CI: 0.842-0.849) and 0.874 (95% CI: 0.850-0.899) for infant and child mortality, respectively. The higher the degree of poverty in the municipalities, the stronger the impact of CCT on reducing child mortality. Given the current economic crisis, a mitigation strategy that will increase the coverage of SP and CCT could avert 148,736 (95% CI: 127,148-170,706) child deaths up to 2030, compared with fiscal austerity measures.

Interpretation: SP and CCT programs could strongly reduce child mortality in LMICs, and their expansion should be considered as an effective strategy to mitigate the impact of the current multiple global economic crises.

Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Grant_Number:INV-027961. Medical Research Council(MRC-UKRI),Grant_Number:MC_PC_MR/T023678/1.

Keywords: Cash transfer programs; Child mortality; Fiscal austerity; Forecasting; Global economic crisis; Impact evaluation; Microsimulation models; Multiple crisis; Poverty; Social pension; Social protection.

Abstract

Grants and funding