Impact of In-house Candida auris Polymerase Chain Reaction Screening on Admission on the Incidence Rates of Surveillance and Blood Cultures With C. auris and Associated Cost Savings

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Nov 10;10(11):ofad567. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad567. eCollection 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The impact of strategies for rapid diagnostic screening of Candida auris on hospital operations has not been previously characterized. We describe the implementation of in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on admission for screening of colonization with C. auris, associated process improvements, and financial impact.

Methods: This study was conducted across an integrated health system. Patients were tested based on risk factors for C. auris carriage. Pre-intervention, the PCR was sent out to a reference laboratory, and postintervention was performed in-house. Changes in the incidence rates (IRs) of C. auris present on admission (CA-POA) and C. auris hospital-onset fungemia (CA-HOF) were assessed using interrupted time series analysis. The economic impact on isolation and testing costs was calculated.

Results: Postintervention, the IR of CA-POA doubled (IRR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.16-5.69; P = .02) compared with the pre-intervention period. The baseline rate of CA-HOF was increasing monthly by 14% (95% CI, 1.05-1.24; P = .002) pre-intervention, while during the postintervention period there was a change in slope with a monthly decrease in IR of 13% (95% CI, 0.80-0.99; P = .02). The median turnaround time (TAT) of the results (interquartile range) was reduced from 11 (8-14) days to 2 (1-3) days. Savings were estimated to be between $772 513.10 and $3 730 480.26.

Conclusions: By performing in-house PCR for screening of C. auris colonization on admission, we found a doubling of CA-POA rates, a subsequent decrease in CA-HOF rates, reduced TAT for PCR results, and more efficient use of infection control measures. In-house testing was cost-effective in a setting of relatively high prevalence among individuals with known risk factors.

Keywords: Candida auris; PCR; fungemia; infection prevention; surveillance.