Introduction: Aspiration mechanical thrombectomy traditionally includes use of an inner microcatheter and leading microwire to navigate an aspiration catheter (AC) to the site of occlusion. Early clinical experience suggests that a leading microwire is often not needed with the Tenzing 7 (T7, Route 92 Medical, San Mateo, CA), a soft tapered tip ledge-reducing delivery catheter. This multicenter experience aims to describe AC delivery success in single-pass thrombectomy using T7 with and without a leading microwire.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients who underwent single-pass thrombectomy with T7 at six institutions between 2020 and 2022. We examined the percentage of successful AC delivery, puncture-to-revascularization time, and procedural complication rate.
Results: A leading microwire with T7 was used in 19/89 (21%) of patients, and it was not used with T7 in 70/89 (79%) of patients. Successful AC delivery was similar with and without microwires (97% vs. 90%, p = 0.15). Median puncture-to-revascularization times were similar (17 min microwire vs. 16 min no-microwire, p = 0.12). No complications were associated with microwire use; one (1.4%) patient had a T7-related vasospasm resolved with verapamil during thrombectomy without a leading microwire. Differences in complication rates were not statistically significant (p = 0.46).
Conclusion: In our real-world clinical experience, leading microwire use was infrequently necessary with the T7 delivery catheter. Successful AC delivery and complication rates were similar with and without microwire use in single-pass T7 thrombectomies. Initial pass with T7 may be performed without use of leading microwire, reserving microwire use for refractory cases or known difficult-to-navigate vasculature.
Keywords: Ischemic stroke; catheter; technique; thrombectomy; treatment outcome.