Objective: Emerging evidence shows that perceived fatigability-the quantification of vulnerability to fatigue in relation to specific intensity and duration of activities-may be associated with cognitive function. We sought to quantify associations with multiple domains of cognitive function and the role of physical activity (PA).
Methods: SOMMA participants completed the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) Physical and Mental subscales (each range 0-50; higher scores=greater fatigability) and three cognitive function assessments [Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), executive function; Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), general function; and California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), memory]. Linear regression quantified associations cross-sectionally between each PFS subscale and cognitive assessment scores adjusting for covariates. Effect modification by volume and intensity of accelerometer-measured PA was assessed.
Results: In 873 participants (59.2% women; age 76.3±5.0; 85% White), mean PFS Physical, Mental, and DSST scores were 15.8±8.7, 7.7±7.8, and 55.4±13.7. After adjustments, for each 4-point higher PFS Physical and 3-point higher PFS Mental, participants had nearly one fewer correct DSST items [β coefficient and 95% confidence interval for PFS Physical: -0.69 (-1.09, - 0.29); PFS Mental: -0.64 (-0.97, -0.30)]. Volume and intensity of PA modified the association of PFS Mental and DSST ( P interactions <0.01). All associations were strongest in those with the lowest volume and intensity of PA. PFS was not associated with MoCA or CVLT.
Discussion: Greater perceived fatigability may be associated with poorer executive function, but not memory. Individuals with greater perceived fatigability, particularly those less active, might benefit from interventions that reduce fatigability and may beneficially influence cognitive function.