Objective: Interventional pathologists have expanded their expertise by acquiring proficiency in ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and are now required to optimize punction procedures due to low resources and digital workflows. The aim of this study is to compare FNAB sample adequacy in two series with one versus two slides available for cytopathological analysis and its influence on diagnosis categorization, time taken to reach a final diagnosis, scanning time and size of the digital files produced.
Methods: Patients were retrospectively selected based on the sampling of thyroid nodules using either two glass slides (two-slide group) or one slide only (one-slide group) and cytological diagnosis was performed using the second edition of the Bethesda system. For each group, the initial 15 cases were sorted to be scanned.
Results: From a total of 713 procedures, 328 were sampled into two slides and 385 on one slide only. No significant differences were found regarding nodule size, location or EU-TIRADS classification between the two groups. The one-slide group did not exhibit a higher prevalence of non-diagnostic or atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) categories. As expected, the mean time taken to finalize diagnoses in cases where only one slide was prepared was 1.2 days faster. Scanning time and total file size were also significantly smaller in the one-slide group.
Conclusions: Adopting the 'one nodule-one puncture-one slide' strategy for thyroid FNAB optimization enhances procedural efficiency in digital workflows, leading to cost savings without compromising diagnostic accuracy.
Keywords: digital pathology; fine-needle aspiration biopsy; interventional pathologist; thyroid.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.