Which method for femoral component sizing when performing kinematic alignment TKA? An in silico study

Abstract

Introduction: The kinematically alignment (KA) technique for TKA aims to reproduce the pre-arthritic knee anatomy, including both the femoro-tibial and femoro-patellar joints. An in silico study was conducted to compare 3 different femoral component sizing techniques to identify the anatomical landmark which allows closest restoration of the native trochlear anatomy. Our study's question was: what was the best method for sizing the femoral component when performing KA-TKA? It was hypothesized that sizing the femoral component by aiming to restore the groove height would be the best method to restore the native trochlear anatomy.

Methods: GMK sphere® (Medacta) femoral component 3D models were virtually kinematically aligned on 30 tri-dimensional (3D) bony osteoarthritis knee models. The femoral component was mediolaterally positioned to match distal native and prosthetic grooves. Three methods were used to size the femoral component: a conventional method with the anterior femoral cut flush to the femoral cortex (C-KATKA) and two alternative personalized methods aiming to recreate either the medial facet's height (ATM-KATKA) or the groove's height (ATG-KATKA). In-house analysis software was used to compare native and prosthetic trochlear articular surfaces and mediolateral implant overhangs.

Results: Compared with the C-KATKA, ATG-KATKA and ATM-KATKA techniques increased the component size by a mean of 0.90 (SD 0.31, min 0.5 to max 1.5) (p<0.001) and 1.02 (SD 0.31, min 0.5 to max 1.5) (p<0.001), respectively. C-KATKA technique substantially proximally understuffed the trochleae with maximum values of 7.11mm (SD 1.39, min 3.93mm to max 10.57mm) in the medial facet, 4.72mm (SD 1.27, min 1.46mm to max 6.86mm) in the lateral facet and 4.51mm (SD 1.40, min 1.92mm to max 7.30mm) in the groove, respectively. Alternative techniques understuffed medial facet with maximum values of 5.07mm (SD 1.29, min 2.83mm to max 8.34mm) and 4.70mm (SD 1.52, min 0.83mm to max 8.04mm) for ATG-KATKA and ATM-KATKA techniques, respectively. There was no significant understuffing of the groove or lateral facet for alternative techniques (ATM and ATG). The ATM-KATKA and ATG-KATKA techniques generated mediolateral implant overhang, mainly postero-lateral, with a rate of 90.0% and 86.7%, respectively. In this study, no mediolateral implant overhang was found for C-KATKA.

Discussion/conclusion: The C-KATKA technique substantially understuffs the native trochlear articular surfaces in medial, lateral and groove parts. Alternative techniques (ATM-KATKA and ATG-KATKA) for sizing the femoral component better restore the native trochlear anatomy but also generate a high rate of postero-lateral implant overhangs. Would this postero-lateral implant overhang be clinically deleterious remains unknown? The aspect ratio of contemporary femoral TKA implants can probably be optimized to allow a better anatomical restoration of the anterior femoral compartment.

Level of evidence: II, in silico study.

Keywords: Anterior compartment; Biomechanics; Joint perception; Personalized; Total knee arthroplasty; Trochlea offset.