Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 and the CoronaVac vaccines and boosters in healthcare workers

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Dec 15;19(3):2275445. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2275445. Epub 2023 Nov 15.

Abstract

The evidence on the waning protection of COVID-19 vaccines has been reviewed by the World Health Organization and has led to consideration of the need for booster doses. This study aimed to evaluate vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19, and the COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers who received various types (inactive or m-RNA) and doses (2 to 4 doses) of the COVID-19 vaccine. The study was conducted with a total of 3,009 healthcare workers between August 1 and November 30, 2021 at a university hospital. Six different vaccination statuses were evaluated in the study. The effectiveness for COVID-19 infection, after adjusting for age, sex, and position, was highest in those who received two doses of CoronaVac and two doses of BNT162b2 (89.3%, 95% CI 72.2-95.9%) and was lowest in those who received two doses of CoronaVac (29%, 95% CI - 8-53%). The adjusted effectiveness of two doses of CoronaVac for COVID-19 infection was not significant (21.0%, 95% CI - 20.7-48.3%) but increased significantly with a booster dose of CoronaVac or BNT162b2. One or two doses of the BNT162b2 booster demonstrated higher effectiveness in comparison to a single dose of the CoronaVac booster. These results indicate the need for a booster dose, and heterologous boosting with BNT162b2 may be a better option for higher effectiveness for those who received two doses of CoronaVac. Future studies should evaluate the need for further booster doses and their long-term effects.

Keywords: BNT162b2; COVID-19; CoronaVac; booster dose; heterologous boosting; vaccine effectiveness.

MeSH terms

  • BNT162 Vaccine
  • COVID-19 Vaccines
  • COVID-19* / prevention & control
  • Health Personnel
  • Humans
  • Vaccines*

Substances

  • sinovac COVID-19 vaccine
  • COVID-19 Vaccines
  • BNT162 Vaccine
  • Vaccines

Grants and funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.