Background: The calibration of the Respiratory Gating for SCanner (RGSC) system is critical to achieve better and more stable accuracy. The current procedure for a wall-mounted RGSC system has a relatively large residual error.
Purpose: To compare the baseline drifts in the image acquisition of DIBH using three reflector blocks versus using a single reflector block in the calibration of a wall-mounted RGSC camera system.
Materials and methods: Varian provides a calibration plate with three rows of calibration points: each row is separated by 15 cm longitudinally and by 10 cm laterally. In Varian's single-block calibration method, the reflector block was first placed on the center point of the calibration plate and aligned with the scanner isocenter. The calibration took a picture of the block, then placed the block on the other eight points sequentially. In the proposed three-block method, we placed three reflector blocks on the center row, with the center block aligned with the isocenter, and we took a picture of the center block by manually blocking the other two blocks in calibration. By moving the couch longitudinally in or out 15 cm, the calibration goes through all nine points. Monte Carlo simulation was done using Matlab to analyze the calibration matrix eigenvalue characteristics.
Results: For a typical scan length of 40 cm of DIBH, the residual baseline drift in simulated DIBH is 0.02 ± 0.03 versus 0.30 ± 0.12 cm for three-block calibration and single-block calibration, respectively. To achieve 0.5 mm tolerance for the eigenvalue, the laser and reflector box should be within ±3 mm uncertainties based on the eigenvalue simulation.
Conclusion: Three-block calibration method effectively removes baseline drift caused by couch movement in DIBH/4D CT scan for the wall-mounted camera while the single-block calibration method still has significant residual baseline drift.
Keywords: RGSC; baseline drift; calibration; wall-mounted camera.
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.