The safety and effectiveness of remote guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) have not been fully appraised in controlled studies. We hereby presented the results of a study on remote guidance (vs on-site guidance) of PCI to explore its feasibility, safety, and effectiveness. Patients were recruited from those who received PCI procedures from January 2018 to June 2019 in a secondary hospital (Jincheng, Shanxi, China), in collaboration with a tertiary medical center (Beijing, China) approximately 680 km away. According to the type of guidance during the procedure, the patients were assigned to two groups: the remote guidance group and the on-site guidance group. Remote guidance was assisted with an advanced commercial telemedicine system. Interventional strategies, procedural success rate, peri-procedural complications, procedural duration, radiation doses, and the amount of contrast medium were compared between the two groups. A total of 352 patients were included in this study, with a total of 411 PCI procedures and 446 target lesions. The baseline clinical characteristics, as well as the distribution and characteristics of coronary artery lesions, did not differ significantly between the two groups. No significant differences were noticed in procedural success rate, peri-procedural complications, procedural duration, radiation dose, and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events. However, the amount of contrast medium was slightly higher in the remote guidance group. The results of the present pilot study showed the feasibility of remotely guided PCI, with safety and effectiveness measures at acceptable levels comparable to the traditional on-site guidance. Randomized studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to further confirm our findings.
Keywords: Remote guidance; on-site guidance; percutaneous coronary intervention; teleguidance; telemedicine.