Nutrition Screening in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Evaluation of an Electronic Medical Record-Based Tool

Nutrients. 2023 Oct 28;15(21):4591. doi: 10.3390/nu15214591.

Abstract

Hospitalized, critically ill children are at increased risk of developing malnutrition. While several pediatric nutrition screening tools exist, none have been validated in the pediatric intensive care units (PICU). The Children's Wisconsin Nutrition Screening Tool (CWNST) is a unique nutrition screening tool that includes the Pediatric Nutrition Screening Tool (PNST) and predictive elements from the electronic medical record and was found to be more sensitive than the PNST in acute care units. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the tool in detecting possible malnutrition in critically ill children. The data analysis, including the results of the current nutrition screening, diagnosis, and nutrition status was performed on all patients admitted to PICUs at Children's Wisconsin in 2019. All 250 patients with ≥1 nutrition assessment by a dietitian were included. The screening elements that were predictive of malnutrition included parenteral nutrition, positive PNST, and BMI-for-age/weight-for-length z-score. The current screen had a sensitivity of 0.985, specificity of 0.06, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.249, and negative predictive value of 0.929 compared to the PNST alone which had a sensitivity of 0.1, specificity of 0.981, PPV of 0.658, and NPV of 0.749. However, of the 250 included patients, 97.2% (243) had a positive nutrition screen. The CWNST can be easily applied through EMRs and predicts the nutrition risk in PICU patients but needs further improvement to improve specificity.

Keywords: critical illness; malnutrition; nutrition assessment; nutrition support.

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Critical Illness
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units, Pediatric
  • Malnutrition* / diagnosis
  • Malnutrition* / etiology
  • Nutrition Assessment
  • Nutritional Status*

Grants and funding

The Children’s Wisconsin Foundation funded this project through the support of the LAMBS fund and Abraham Family Fund. The funders had no role in study design, interpretation, and/or the writing of this manuscript.