The effect of the surgical helmet system on intraoperative contamination in arthroplasty surgery

Hongtai Chen; Vincent W K Chan; Chun H Yan; Henry Fu; Ping-Keung Chan; KwongYuen Chiu

doi:10.1302/2633-1462.411.BJO-2023-0078.R1

The effect of the surgical helmet system on intraoperative contamination in arthroplasty surgery

Bone Jt Open. 2023 Nov 13;4(11):859-864. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.411.BJO-2023-0078.R1.

Authors

Hongtai Chen¹, Vincent W K Chan¹, Chun H Yan¹, Henry Fu¹, Ping-Keung Chan¹, KwongYuen Chiu¹

Affiliation

¹ Division of Joint Replacement Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.

PMID: 37952558
PMCID: PMC10640923
DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.411.BJO-2023-0078.R1

Abstract

Aims: The surgical helmet system (SHS) was developed to reduce the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but the evidence is contradictory, with some studies suggesting an increased risk of PJI due to potential leakage through the glove-gown interface (GGI) caused by its positive pressure. We assumed that SHS and glove exchange had an impact on the leakage via GGI.

Methods: There were 404 arthroplasty simulations with fluorescent gel, in which SHS was used (H+) or not (H-), and GGI was sealed (S+) or not (S-), divided into four groups: H+S+, H+S-, H-S+, and H-S-, varying by exposure duration (15 to 60 minutes) and frequency of glove exchanges (0 to 6 times). The intensity of fluorescent leakage through GGI was quantified automatically with an image analysis software. The effect of the above factors on fluorescent leakage via GGI were compared and analyzed.

Results: The leakage intensity increased with exposure duration and frequency of glove exchanges in all groups. When SHS was used and GGI was not sealed (H+S-), the leakage intensity via GGI had the fastest increase, consistently higher than other groups (H+S+, H-S+ and H-S-) after 30 minutes (p < 0.05) and when there were more than four instances of glove exchange (p < 0.05). Additionally, the leakage was strongly correlated with the duration of exposure (r_s = 0.8379; p < 0.050) and the frequency of glove exchange (r_s = 0.8198; p < 0.050) in H+S-. The correlations with duration and frequency turned weak when SHS was not used (H-) or GGI was sealed off (S+).

Conclusion: Due to personal protection, SHS is recommended in arthroplasties. Meanwhile, it is strongly recommended to seal the GGI of the inner gloves and exchange the outer gloves hourly to reduce the risk of contamination from SHS.