The maluma/takete effect is late: No longitudinal evidence for shape sound symbolism in the first year

PLoS One. 2023 Nov 9;18(11):e0287831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287831. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The maluma/takete effect refers to an association between certain language sounds (e.g., /m/ and /o/) and round shapes, and other language sounds (e.g., /t/ and /i/) and spiky shapes. This is an example of sound symbolism and stands in opposition to arbitrariness of language. It is still unknown when sensitivity to sound symbolism emerges. In the present series of studies, we first confirmed that the classic maluma/takete effect would be observed in adults using our novel 3-D object stimuli (Experiments 1a and 1b). We then conducted the first longitudinal test of the maluma/takete effect, testing infants at 4-, 8- and 12-months of age (Experiment 2). Sensitivity to sound symbolism was measured with a looking time preference task, in which infants were shown images of a round and a spiky 3-D object while hearing either a round- or spiky-sounding nonword. We did not detect a significant difference in looking time based on nonword type. We also collected a series of individual difference measures including measures of vocabulary, movement ability and babbling. Analyses of these measures revealed that 12-month olds who babbled more showed a greater sensitivity to sound symbolism. Finally, in Experiment 3, we had parents take home round or spiky 3-D printed objects, to present to 7- to 8-month-old infants paired with either congruent or incongruent nonwords. This language experience had no effect on subsequent measures of sound symbolism sensitivity. Taken together these studies demonstrate that sound symbolism is elusive in the first year, and shed light on the mechanisms that may contribute to its eventual emergence.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Hearing
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Language
  • Phonetics*
  • Sound
  • Symbolism*

Grants and funding

This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC; https://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.c) through an Insight Development Grant (430-2017-00003) to PP and SC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.