Collection methods critical load values and total nitrogen budgets for high-elevation and fog-impacted sites requires reliable cloud and fog water deposition estimates. The cost and labor intensity of cloud/fog water sample collection have made it difficult to conduct long-term studies that would provide the data needed to develop accurate estimates. Current understanding of fog formation, transport, and the role of fog and cloud deposition in hydrogeological and biogeochemical cycles is incomplete due, in part, to lack of a concerted interdisciplinary approach to the problem. Historically, these obstacles have limited interest in and collection of cloud and fog water samples. In addition to measurements of cloud/fog chemical composition, documenting fog/cloud deposition fluxes of pollutant and nutrient species requires knowledge of cloud/fog physical properties, frequency and duration of fog/cloud interception with landscapes, properties of vegetation on those landscapes, and properties of the wind that drive droplet/vegetation interactions. Because drop deposition efficiency is dependent on drop size, it is also important to consider variations in fog/cloud drop composition with drop size as species enriched in larger/ smaller drops will experience enhanced/reduced deposition rates. This paper presents summary results from a small U.S. cloud water monitoring network that operated from the mid-nineties through 2011, as well as a brief qualitative review of other cloud and fog water studies conducted in the United States (including Puerto Rico), Europe, South America/Pacific, and Asia. Current collection methods are also reviewed. Recent scientific efforts by the National Atmospheric Deposition Program's (NADP) Total Deposition Science Committee and NADP's Critical Loads of Atmospheric Deposition Science Committee have identified occult (cloud/fog) deposition as a "need" in developing critical loads for ecosystems that experience.