Objective: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models can potentially aid in pre-operative planning of transarterial radioactive microparticle injections to treat hepatocellular carcinoma, but these models are computationally very costly. Previously, we introduced the hybrid particle-flow model as a surrogate, less costly modelling approach for the full particle distribution in truncated hepatic arterial trees. We hypothesized that higher cross-sectional particle spread could increase the match between flow and particle distribution. Here, we investigate whether truncation is still reliable for selective injection scenarios, and if spread is an important factor to consider for reliable truncation.
Methods: Moderate and severe up- and downstream truncation for selective injection served as input for the hybrid model to compare downstream particle distributions with non-truncated models. In each simulation, particle cross-sectional spread was quantified for 5-6 planes.
Results: Severe truncation gave maximum differences in particle distribution of ∼4-11% and ∼8-9% for down- and upstream truncation, respectively. For moderate truncation, these differences were only ∼1-1.5% and ∼0.5-2%. Considering all particles, spread increased downstream of the tip to 80-90%. However, spread was found to be much lower at specific timepoints, indicating high time-dependency.
Conclusion: Combining domain truncation with hybrid particle-flow modelling is an effective method to reduce computational complexity, but moderate truncation is more reliable than severe truncation. Time-dependent spread measures show where differences might arise between flow and particle modelling.
Significance: The hybrid particle-flow model cuts down computational time significantly by reducing the physical domain, paving the way towards future clinical applications.