Is there a gender gap in clinical neurosciences? A cross-sectional analysis of female participation in academic neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Dec:155:105458. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105458. Epub 2023 Nov 4.

Abstract

Gender equality or the lack thereof is a constantly recurring theme. Here, we sought to provide an overview of the status with respect to the participation and leadership of female doctors in clinical neuroscience analyzing different disciplines (neurosurgery, neurology and psychiatry). A total of 1910 articles published in six representative journals (07-12/2020) were reviewed. Of these, 1327 were original research papers, 145 invited publications and 303 letters/comments. Out of a total of 15,080 authors, 4365 (29%) were women. The percentage of female authors was found to differ significantly between the different specialties (19% in neurosurgery, 39% in neurology and 45% in psychiatry). Women were last authors in 9.5% of the papers in neurosurgery, 29% in neurology and 39% in psychiatry Based on these findings, it can be concluded that gender disparity in academic neuroscience is quite conspicuous. Our review seeks to address the reasons behind this phenomenon in the context of new publications as well as various cultural and historical underpinnings.

Keywords: Academic neuroscience; Gender disparity; Neurology; Neurosurgery; Psychiatry.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Neurology*
  • Neurosciences*
  • Neurosurgery*
  • Psychiatry*
  • Sex Factors