Purpose: The sural nerve is the autologous nerve used most commonly for grafting. However, recent studies indicate a high rate of complications and complaints after sural nerve removal. In this prospective study, we evaluated donor-site morbidity following full-length sural nerve harvesting on long-term follow-up.
Methods: Fifty-one legs from 43 patients who underwent complete sural nerve harvesting for brachial plexus reconstruction were included in the study. After an average of 5 years, with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 12 months, sensory deficits in the leg and foot were analyzed using 2.0-g monofilaments. Regions of sensory deficit were marked with a skin marker and photographed. Over these regions of decreased sensation, we tested nociception using an eyebrow tweezer. Patients were also asked about pain, cold intolerance, pruritis, difficulties walking, and foot swelling.
Results: Regions most affected (84% of patients) were over the calcaneus and cuboid. However, in these regions, nociception was preserved. Regions of decreased sensation extended to the calf region in 11 of 51 legs. In 13 patients, we also observed regions of decreased sensation on the proximal leg. In five feet, the sensation was entirely preserved. No patient had any complaints about pain, cold intolerance, itchiness, difficulties walking, or foot swelling.
Conclusion: Decreased sensation with nociception preserved was most common along the lateral side of the foot over the calcaneus and cuboid. Removing the entire sural nerve produced no long-term complaints of pain. Sural nerve use appears safe.
Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic II.
Keywords: Brachial plexus palsy; donor-site morbidity; sensory deficit; sural nerve harvest.
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.