Background: Temporomandibular joint arthroscopy (TMJA) is often performed under general anaesthesia (GA) worldwide on an inpatient basis, whereas local anaesthesia (LA) is not equally considered as the standard procedure.
Objectives: To compare the efficacy between LA and GA when performing TMJA.
Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed a total of 182 patients in LA group and 91 patients in GA group who underwent TMJA for the management of disc displacement. Patients were divided into two groups based on type of anaesthesia used for surgery; LA group and GA group. Comparisons were made based on operative time, intubation and extubation time (for GA only), hospital stay duration, total cost and post-operative clinical and radiological outcomes.
Results: The demographics and pre-operative clinical assessments were matched in both groups. No post-operative significant difference was found in outcomes when performing TMJA under LA compared to GA in terms of pain reduction (p = .016) and improvement in mouth opening (p = .866). The median operative time and hospital stay duration for LA group were significantly less compared to GA group (p < .001). GA group required an additional intubation and extubation time, whereas LA group patients were waived from it. TMJA for LA group was performed in the minor procedure setup, which reduced the costs for surgery (p < .001). Post-operative disc position was excellent and good with an overall success rate of 95%.
Conclusion: The use of LA performing TMJA reduces operating time, costs, hospital stay and recovery room time than GA group. Furthermore, TMJA performed under LA shared similar post-operative clinical and radiological outcomes with those performed under GA.
Keywords: arthroscopy; general anaesthesia; joint dislocation; local anesthesia; temporomandibular joint.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.