Introduction: We aimed to analyze the long-term cost of overactive bladder third-line treatments.
Methods: This insurance claims review analyzed the 2015 to 2020 MarketScan (MKS) claims data set subjects age ≥ 18, diagnosis of overactive bladder (OAB) using ICD-9/ICD-10 codes and receipt of treatment for percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, sacral neuromodulation (SNM), or botulinum A. Age, gender, treatment types, and cost were extracted. Treatment costs were aggregated at the level of patient and treatment type for total payment and patient contribution by combining copay, coinsurance, and deductible. We used the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous and chi-square test for categorical variables. SAS v9.4 was used for analyses. Significance was set at P < .05.
Results: We identified 17,755 patients from the commercial claims MKS and 10,912 patients from the Medicare supplemental (MDC) database with mean age 50.7±11.1 and 75.5±7.6 years, respectively, who underwent ≥ 1 third-line OAB treatment. Patients receiving third-line treatment were predominantly female (84.9%, MKS, 74.8%, MDC). Long-term costs over a 15-year period were estimated. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation is the most expensive in terms of total net payment ($105,337.50 MKS, $94,102.50 MDC) and patient contribution ($9177.60 MKS, $3921.00 MDC). Total net payment for botulinum A was $67,968 (MSK), $54,261 (MDC), and patient contribution cost was $2850 (MSK), $1110 (MDC). The most cost-effective option was SNM in terms of both total net payment ($5179.10 MKS, $6099.00 MDC) and patient contribution ($59.10 MKS, $60.00 MDC).
Conclusions: SNM was the most cost-effective third-line treatment for OAB looking over a 15-year period in terms of both total net payment and patient contribution.
Keywords: botulinum A; overactive bladder; posterior tibial nerve stimulation; sacral neuromodulation; urinary incontinence.