Developments in Leishmaniasis diagnosis: A patent landscape from 2010 to 2022

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Nov 1;3(11):e0002557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002557. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The current study aims to contribute to the understanding of leishmaniasis diagnosis by providing an overview of patent filings in this field and analyzing whether the methods revealed are consistent with the needs described by the scientific community, in special the main gaps detected by the World Health Organization's 2021-2030 Roadmap for Neglected Tropical Diseases. To this aim, a patent search was carried out focusing on documents disclosing leishmaniasis diagnostic methods supported by experimental evidence and with earliest priority date from 2010 onwards. Our results show that patenting activity is low and patent families are often formed by individual filings. Most R&D activity occurs in Brazil, which is also the main market of protection. Brazilian academic institutions are the main patent drivers, and collaboration between different institutions is rare. Most patent families describe immunological methods based on ELISA assays, using antibodies directed to K39 and homologues. kDNA is the primary gene for molecular testing. Experimental evidence of test performance in fulfilling critical diagnostic gaps is usually absent. The patent scenario suggests that leishmaniasis diagnostic gaps need to be more closely addressed to drive innovation directed to the control and/or elimination of leishmaniasis. From the public policy point of view, the following strategies are suggested: (i) strengthening collaborative networks, (ii) enhancing the participation of the private sector, and (iii) increasing funding, with special focus on the remaining diagnostic gaps.

Grants and funding

This work was funded by FAPEMIG via the following grants: ACN-00110-21 (AFF), and APQ-00802-20 (DMA). Funding for publication was provided by CNPq, CAPES, and FAPERJ through the National Institutes of Science and Technology Program (INCT) to Carlos Morel (INCT/IDPN). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.