Objective: The absence of MRI-lesion reduces considerably the probability of having an excellent outcome (International League Against Epilepsies [ILAE] class I-II) after epilepsy surgery. Surgical success in magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI)-negative cases relies therefore mainly on non-invasive techniques such as positron-emission tomography (PET), subtraction ictal/inter-ictal single-photon-emission-computed-tomography co-registered to MRI (SISCOM), electric source imaging (ESI) and morphometric MRI analysis (MAP). We were interested in identifying the optimal imaging technique or combination to achieve post-operative class I-II in patients with MRI-negative focal epilepsy.
Methods: We identified 168 epileptic patients without MRI lesion. Thirty-three (19.6%) were diagnosed with unifocal epilepsy, underwent surgical resection and follow-up ⩾ 2 years. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and diagnostic odds ratio (OR) were calculated for each technique individually and in combination (after co-registration).
Results: 23/33 (70%) were free of disabling seizures (75.0% with temporal and 61.5% extratemporal lobe epilepsy). None of the individual modalities presented an OR > 1.5, except ESI if only patients with interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) were considered (OR 3.2). On a dual combination, SISCOM with ESI presented the highest outcome (OR = 6). MAP contributed to detecting indistinguishable focal cortical dysplasia in particular in extratemporal epilepsies with a sensitivity of 75%. Concordance of PET, ESI on interictal epileptic discharges, and SISCOM was associated with the highest chance for post-operative seizure control (OR = 11).
Conclusion: If MRI is negative, the chances to benefit from epilepsy surgery are almost as high as in lesional epilepsy, provided that multiple established non-invasive imaging tools are rigorously applied and co-registered together.
Keywords: Adults; Children; ESI; Epilepsy surgery; Focal epilepsy; MRI-negative; Morphometry; Non-lesional; PET; SISCOM; SPECT.
© 2023. The Author(s).