Comparison of High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilators

Abstract

Background: The performance of high-frequency oscillatory ventilators (HFOV) differs by the waveform generation mode and circuit characteristics. Few studies have described the performance of piston-type HFOV. The present study aimed to compare the amplitude required to reach the target high-frequency tidal volume ([Formula: see text]); determine the relationship between the settings and actual pressure in amplitude or mean airway pressure ([Formula: see text]); and describe the interaction among compliance, frequency, and endotracheal tube (ETT) inner diameter in 4 HFOV models, including Humming X, Vue (a piston type ventilator commonly used in Japan), VN500 (a diaphragm type), and SLE5000 (a reverse jet type).

Methods: The oscillatory ventilators were evaluated by using a 50-mL test lung with 0.5 and 1.0 mL/cm H₂O compliance, [Formula: see text] of 10 cm H₂O, frequency of 12 and 15 Hz, and ETT inner diameters 2.0, 2.5, and 3.5 mm. At each permutation of compliance, frequency, and ETT, the target high-frequency [Formula: see text] was increased from 0.5 to 3.0 mL. The change in [Formula: see text] from the ventilator (ventilator [Formula: see text]) to Y-piece (Y [Formula: see text]) and alveolar pressure (alveolar [Formula: see text]) and the change in amplitude from the ventilator (ventilator amplitude) to Y-piece (Y amplitude) and alveolar pressure (alveolar amplitude) were determined at high-frequency [Formula: see text] of 1.0 and 3.0 mL.

Results: To achieve the target high-frequency [Formula: see text], the Humming X and Vue required a higher amplitude than did the SLE5000, but the maximum amplitude in the VN500 was unable to attain a larger high-frequency [Formula: see text]. Ventilator [Formula: see text] and alveolar pressure decreased at the Y-piece with the Humming X and Vue but increased with the SLE5000. The ventilator [Formula: see text] in the VN500 decreased remarkably at a frequency of 15 Hz. The ventilator amplitude in all 4 ventilators decreased while temporarily increasing at the Y-piece in the VN500.

Conclusions: The actual measured value, such as alveolar [Formula: see text] and high-frequency [Formula: see text], varied according to the type of HFOV system and the inner diameter of the ETT, even with identical settings. Clinicians should therefore determine the setting appropriate to each HFOV model.

Keywords: amplitude; high-frequency oscillatory ventilation; high-frequency tidal volume; mean airway pressure; neonate.