Are Online Simulations for Radiation Emergency Medical Preparedness Less Effective in Teaching Than Face-to-Face Simulations?

Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2023 Oct 26:17:e520. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2023.188.

Abstract

Objective: The study clarified differences in understanding and satisfaction between face-to-face and online training on radiation emergency medical preparedness (REMP) training.

Methods: The training was held at Hirosaki University between 2018 and 2022, with 46 face-to-face participants and 25 online participants.

Results: Face-to-face training was significantly more understandable than online for the use of the Geiger counter (P < 0.05), but the educational effect of virtual reality (VR) was not significantly different from the actual practice. For the team exercise of taking care of the victims, online resulted in a significantly higher understanding (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Interactive exercises can be done online with equipment sent to learners, and VR is also as effective. The use of videos was more effective for first-timers to learn the practical process from a bird's-eye view, especially for team-based medical procedures.

Keywords: VR; medical preparedness; online simulations; radiation emergency.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Learning*
  • Virtual Reality*