Background: One in six five 16-year-olds have a probable mental health difficulty. Of these, almost half of older teenagers and a quarter of 11-16-year-olds report having self-harmed or attempted suicide. Currently, there is little research into mental health crisis services for young people, with little understanding of what services exist, who uses them, or what works best.
Question: 'How are mental health crisis responses for children and young people up to the age of 25 sustained, experienced and integrated within their local systems of services'?
Objectives: 1. To describe National Health Service (NHS), local authority, education and third sector approaches to the implementation and organisation of crisis care for children and young people across England and Wales. 2. To identify eight contrasting case studies in which to evaluate how crisis services have developed and are currently organised, sustained, experienced and integrated within the context of their local systems of services. 3. To compare and contrast these services in the context of the available international evidence, drawing out and disseminating clear implications for the design and delivery of future crisis responses for children and young people and their families.
Methods: A sequential mixed methods approach, underpinned by normalisation process theory will be employed. A survey will create a detailed record of how crisis responses across England and Wales are organised, implemented and used. Subsequently, eight contrasting services in relation to geographic and socioeconomic setting, populations served, and service configuration will be identified as case studies. Interviews will be conducted with children, young people and parents/carers who have used the service, as well as commissioners, managers and practitioners. Operational policies and service usage data will also be examined. Analysis of how each service is provided, experienced, implemented and sustained will be conducted both inductively and deductively, reflecting normalisation process theory constructs.
Keywords: Mental health crisis; children and young people; crisis services; service models; normalisation process theory; sequential mixed methods; case study; qualitative research.
Background: There has been a sharp increase in children and young people experiencing extreme emotional distress and/or self-harm, which is also known as ‘crisis’. Services for young people in crisis are a priority in the UK but little is currently known about what crisis services exist, who uses them, or what type of service works best.
Aim and objectives: This project aims to explore the types of mental health crisis services currently available to children and young people up to the age of 25 in England and Wales, and to examine how they are organised, perceived and integrated within other local care systems. The objectives are to: 1. Find out what NHS, local authority, education and charity sector crisis services exist for children and young people across England and Wales, to describe the services and to create a database of them. 2. Identify eight contrasting services from the database and evaluate how these services are organised, perceived and integrated within local care systems. 3. Compare and contrast these services with the available international evidence, drawing out clear implications for the design and delivery of future crisis responses for children and young people and their families.
Methods: We will use a survey to create a database of crisis response services across England and Wales. From the database we will identify eight contrasting services and we will conduct interviews with children, young people and parents/carers who have used the service as well as managers and staff. We will look at how the services work and explore how they are used and by whom. We will compare and contrast each case study and consider findings of other research studies from around the world to draw clear, actionable, lessons for the future provision of high-quality crisis services for children and young people.
Copyright: © 2023 Bennett C et al.