Background: Several studies have investigated the detection of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) using metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). However, to our knowledge, no study has evaluated the diagnostic value of mNGS detection using blood cells. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the performance of a whole blood mNGS assay which includes the results of plasma and blood cells mNGS detection.
Methods: We selected a panel of seven microorganisms to validate both the plasma and blood cells assay for their limits of detection (LoD), linearity, precision, and robustness to interference. In a multicentered prospective study conducted from January 2021 to April 2022, we tested 253 septic patients with plasma and blood cells mNGS and compared it with blood cultures (BCs). The performance of pathogen detection was compared between mNGS and BCs.
Results: The LoD for plasma and blood cells mNGS was 8.3-140 genome equivalents (GE)/mL and 26 to 534 colony-forming units (CFU) or copies/mL, respectively. The inter- and intra-assay reproducibility of both plasma and blood cells mNGS was 100%. Compared to plasma mNGS alone, the sensitivity of whole blood mNGS was increased by 18.04% when using BCs as the standard (67.21% vs 85.25%). Furthermore, the sensitivity of whole blood mNGS in diagnosing bloodstream infections (BSIs) was 85.21%, which was significantly higher than that of BCs (36.09%, P＜0.0001) and plasma mNGS (69.82%; P = 0.0007). Additional analysis showed that blood cells mNGS was able to detect bacteria missed by plasma mNGS, while plasma mNGS was effective at detecting viruses.
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that whole blood mNGS shows great potential as a promising diagnostic technique for BSIs owing to its ability to identify pathogens with higher sensitivity.
Keywords: Blood cells; Blood culture; Bloodstream infection; Plasma; Sepsis; Whole blood mNGS.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.