Background: Approaches to chronic wound care are worlds apart: In developing nations, the care of chronic wounds often involves traditional management with local products (eg, honey, boiled potato peels, aloe vera gel, banana leaves); whereas in developed nations, more expensive and technologically advanced products are available (eg, wound vacuum, saline wound chamber, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, antibacterial foam). The cost for wound care plays a significant role in total health care costs, and that cost is expected to rise dramatically.
Case presentation: A healthy, 60-year-old man presented after being bitten by a spider 6 days earlier. He was treated and prescribed clindamycin 300 mg 4 times daily for 14 days. Despite treatment, the wound continued to enlarge, and the patient showed symptoms of septicemia. The patient was admitted to the hospital and remained for 3 days. On discharge the patient was given a prescription for doxycycline 100 mg twice a day for 10 days and instructed to use iodoform gauze to pack the wound during daily dressing changes. However, the gauze was ineffective. The patient's dressing was switched to an antibacterial foam dressing impregnated with gentian violet and methylene blue.
Conclusions: There is a disparity in available wound care product availability. Modern products may yield faster healing times with fewer adverse effects than traditional products. Products used by local healers can produce satisfactory results when more modern products are unavailable and at a fraction of the cost.
Copyright © 2023 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.