Performance comparison of four qPCR and three autosomal STR commercial kits from degraded skeletal remains

Forensic Sci Int. 2023 Dec:353:111856. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111856. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

Abstract

This research evaluates the current DNA quantification (Quantifiler™ Trio, PowerQuant®, Investigator® Quantiplex® Pro and InnoQuant® HY Fast) and autosomal STRs amplification kits (GlobalFiler™, PowerPlex® Fusion 6 C, Investigator® 24Plex QS) using 62 degraded skeletal remains from armed conflicts (petrous bone, femur, tibia, and tooth) with several parameters (autosomal small, large, and male target, degradation index, probability of degradation, number of alleles above analytical threshold, number of alleles above stochastic threshold, RFU, peak height ratio, number of reportable loci). The best qPCR/autosomal STRs amplification tandem was determined by comparing quantification results by a DNA quantity estimation based on sample average RFU. InnoQuant® HY Fast was the most sensitive kit, and no significative differences were observed among amplification kits; however, Investigator® 24 Plex QS was found to be the most sensitive in our samples. That is why InnoQuant™ and Investigator® 24Plex QS were determined to be the best tandem.

Keywords: Critical samples; DNA Quantification; QPCR; STR Analysis; Skeletal remains.

MeSH terms

  • Body Remains
  • DNA / analysis
  • DNA Fingerprinting* / methods
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Microsatellite Repeats
  • Tooth* / chemistry

Substances

  • DNA