Significant prostate cancer risk after MRI-guided biopsy showing benign findings: Results from a cohort of 381 men

Fr J Urol. 2024 Jan;34(1):102547. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Oct 17.

Abstract

Background: MRI-guided biopsy (MGB) contributes to the diagnosis of clinically significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa). However, there are no clear recommendations for the management of men after a negative MGB. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of csPCa after a first negative MGB.

Methods: Between 2014 and 2020, we selected men with a PI-RADS score ≥ 3 on MRI and a negative MGB (showing benign findings) performed for suspected prostate cancer. MGB (targeted and systematic biopsies) was performed using fully integrated mobile fusion imaging (KOELIS). The primary endpoint was the rate of csPCa (defined as an ISUP grade ≥ 2) diagnosed after a first negative MGB.

Results: A total of 381 men with a negative MGB and a median age of 65 (IQR: 59-69, range: 46-85) years were included. During the median follow-up of 31 months, 124 men (32.5%) had a new MRI, and 76 (19.9%) were referred for a new MGB, which revealed csPCa in 16 (4.2%) of them. We found no statistical difference in the characteristics of men diagnosed with csPCa compared with men with no csPCa after the second MGB.

Conclusion: We observed a risk of significant prostate cancer in 4% of men two years after a negative MRI-guided biopsy. Performing a repeat MRI could improve the selection of men who will benefit from a repeat MRI-guided biopsy, but a clear protocol is needed to follow these patients.

Keywords: Image-guided biopsy; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Prostatic neoplasms.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Humans
  • Image-Guided Biopsy / adverse effects
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional* / methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prostatic Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional / methods