Do we need a co-pilot in the operating theatre? A cross-sectional study on surgeons' perceptions

Scott Med J. 2023 Nov;68(4):166-174. doi: 10.1177/00369330231207989. Epub 2023 Oct 18.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this original study was to investigate general surgeons' perceptions on the role of dual surgeon operating for high-risk, elective complex surgical procedures.

Material and methods: A 21-part cross-sectional online survey was self-completed by 85 general surgeons across hospitals in the UK. The survey assessed the perception of dual surgeon operating on patient morbidity and mortality, surgeons' burnout rates, complaints, patient waiting times and overall trainee experience. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 3.6.1.

Results: Overall 78.8% believed that dual surgeon operating could help to overcome these human factors. Sub-analysis includes improve surgeon fatigue (89.4%), improve confidence (83.5%), improve decision-making (76.5%), minimise technical error (69.4%), improve communication, team work and leadership skills (65.9%). 65.9% believed it would reduce surgeons' burnout. There was a statistically significant relationship between the participants believing it would reduce surgeons' burnout and those who felt it would reduce complaints, Chi-squared(4) = [30.8], p = [0.00000342]. A statistically significant relationship was noted between participants believing it would reduce surgeons' burnout and those who felt it would reduce patient mortality/morbidity, Chi-squared(4) = [19.9], p = [0.000517].

Conclusion: The survey has highlighted positive surgeons' perceptions regarding dual surgeon operating.

Keywords: Dual surgeon operating; morbidity and mortality risks; patient safety.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Elective Surgical Procedures
  • Humans
  • Operating Rooms
  • Pilots*
  • Surgeons*