Background: Arytenoid cartilage dislocation is considered as a rare laryngeal injury and closed reduction is commonly used as the first choice for the arytenoid dislocation. However, the tools of closed reduction vary, and there is no dedicated tool for closed reduction, and the treatment outcome varies from person to person. This study compared the treatment outcome of the modified laryngeal forceps and traditional laryngeal forceps. Material and Methods: This study conformed to the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines regarding retrospective studies. From May 2021 to February 2023, the records of 28 patients with arytenoid cartilage dislocation caused by endotracheal intubation were reviewed. They were divided into the traditional group (n = 14) and the modified group (n = 14) by gender. Indirect or direct laryngoscopy, video stroboscopy, high-resolution computed tomography, and cricoarytenoid joint 3-dimensional reconstruction were used to evaluate arytenoid position and motion. Clinical characteristics, voice function, procedural skill, and treatment outcome for each case were recorded. Results: Each patient was diagnosed with arytenoid dislocation caused by endotracheal intubation. There was no significant difference in the treatment outcome between the traditional group and the modified group (P > .05). However, the median time interval between closed reduction and the return of normal voice in the traditional group was 31.08 ± 10.56 days, which was significantly longer than the median time of 17.92 ± 3.83 days in the modified group (P < .05). Conclusion: Closed reduction with the modified laryngeal forceps under local anesthesia is an effective and safe procedure. Compared with traditional laryngeal forceps, the modified laryngeal forceps can shorten the treatment duration.
Keywords: arytenoid cartilage dislocation; cricoarytenoid joint 3-dimensional reconstruction; modified laryngeal forceps; treatment outcome.