An improved approach for evaluating landscape ecological risks and exploring its coupling coordination with ecosystem services

Hongjiang Guo; Yanpeng Cai; Bowen Li; Hang Wan; Zhifeng Yang

doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119277

An improved approach for evaluating landscape ecological risks and exploring its coupling coordination with ecosystem services

J Environ Manage. 2023 Dec 15:348:119277. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119277. Epub 2023 Oct 14.

Authors

Hongjiang Guo¹, Yanpeng Cai², Bowen Li¹, Hang Wan¹, Zhifeng Yang¹

Affiliations

¹ Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Quality Improvement and Ecological Restoration for Watersheds, Institute of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China; Key Laboratory for City Cluster Environmental Safety and Green Development of the Ministry of Education, School of Ecology, Environment and Resources, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
² Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Quality Improvement and Ecological Restoration for Watersheds, Institute of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China; Key Laboratory for City Cluster Environmental Safety and Green Development of the Ministry of Education, School of Ecology, Environment and Resources, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China. Electronic address: yanpeng.cai@gdut.edu.cn.

PMID: 37839199
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119277

Abstract

The rapid urbanization has accelerated the destruction of regional ecosystems, triggering ecological risks and threatening sustainable development. Landscape ecological risk (LER) evaluation is an effective tool to mitigate such negative impacts. However, the existing evaluation systems exhibit certain subjectivity. Therefore, an improved LER evaluation method was proposed, which incorporates ecosystem services (ESs) to characterize landscape vulnerability. The method was validated using the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration (PRDUA) as the study area. The results showed that the optimal grain size and extent for landscape pattern analysis in the PRDUA were determined to be 150 m and 6km × 6 km, respectively. The comparison results with the traditional LER evaluation method demonstrated the improved method's superior rationality and reliability. The hotspot analysis based on the Getis-Ord Gi* method revealed that the hotspots of LER were mainly concentrated in the densely populated areas of the south-central region of the PRDUA. The coupling coordination degree (CCD) between LERs and ESs showed four different levels of development in both temporal and spatial dimensions, generally dominated by moderately balanced development and lagging ESs, reflecting the unbalanced ecological environment and socio-economic development of the PRDUA. It is recommended that the ecosystems in the PRDUA be managed and protected separately according to the delineated Ecological Protection Area (EPA), Urban Built-up Area (UBA), and Urban Ecological Boundary Area (UEBA). This study can provide an important reference for regional ecosystem conservation and management.

Keywords: Hotspot analysis; Landscape ecological risk; Landscape vulnerability; Pearl river Delta urban agglomeration; Scale effect.

MeSH terms

China
Cities
Conservation of Natural Resources*
Ecosystem*
Reproducibility of Results
Rivers
Urbanization