A qualitative study on the implementation of a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy for children in a child welfare residential treatment program

Gina Dimitropoulos; David Lindenbach; Alida Anderson; Melissa Rowbotham; Emily Wang; Madison Heintz; Jill Ehrenreich-May; Paul D Arnold

doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106487

A qualitative study on the implementation of a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy for children in a child welfare residential treatment program

Child Abuse Negl. 2023 Dec:146:106487. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106487. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

Authors

Gina Dimitropoulos¹, David Lindenbach², Alida Anderson², Melissa Rowbotham², Emily Wang³, Madison Heintz², Jill Ehrenreich-May⁴, Paul D Arnold²

Affiliations

¹ Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: gdimit@ucalgary.ca.
² Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
³ Pathways to Prevention: A Centre for Childhood Trauma, Hull Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
⁴ Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.

PMID: 37837713
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106487

Abstract

Background: Youth with severe emotional or behavioral issues who are involved with child welfare authorities are sometimes placed in intensive care services in a residential treatment program. Evidence-based psychotherapies are often used in residential treatments, but there is very little research on how to adapt psychotherapy for residential treatment.

Objective: To describe the implementation of a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy (the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children) in a residential treatment program for children.

Participants and setting: Staff (n = 20) at a residential facility in Calgary, Canada.

Methods: A combination of qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted before and after therapy to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation. Data were analyzed and reported using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies.

Results: Modifications were made to the program including creating inclusive language, integrating relevant content targeting pediatric irritability, delivering sessions online for caregivers, and using additional staff to support youth to learn and practice the application of the content and behavioral interventions. Key barriers to implementation of the Unified Protocol included staff turnover and the difficulty of sustaining a critical mass of knowledge surrounding the Unified Protocol. The major facilitators to implementation were the perceived quality of the program and advantages of the program to children and their caregivers.

Conclusions: This study supports the feasibility and acceptability of providing transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapies for children in residential treatment and provides a template for how to implement evidence-based practice in residential treatment.

Keywords: Child maltreatment; Consolidated framework for implementation research; Implementation science; Residential treatment; Transdiagnostic; Unified protocol.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Adolescent
Child
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy* / methods
Focus Groups
Humans
Psychotherapy / methods
Qualitative Research
Residential Treatment* / methods