Outcomes of laparoscopic and open ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement

Am J Surg. 2024 Jan:227:123-126. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Oct 4.

Abstract

Objective: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement requires a concurrent abdominal procedure. For peritoneal access laparoscopic or open approach may be utilized. Our aim was to compare patient/procedure characteristics and outcomes by peritoneal approach for VP shunts in children.

Methods: NSQIP-Pediatric procedure targeted cerebral spinal fluid shunt Participant Use Data Files from 2016 to 2020 were queried. Patients were grouped into laparoscopic vs open abdominal approach. Patient demographics, procedure characteristics and 30-day outcomes were compared.

Results: 7742 NSQIP-Pediatric patients underwent VP shunt placement. Patients undergoing laparoscopic approach were older and required less preoperative support. Mean operative time was longer with laparoscopy (mean(SD): 74.2(48.1) vs. 64.6(39) minutes, p ​< ​0.0001) but had shorter hospital LOS. There was no difference in SSI, readmissions, or reoperation rates.

Conclusion: Patients undergoing laparoscopy for distal VP shunts are older with less support needs preoperatively. While laparoscopic approach had a shorter hospital LOS, there was no demonstratable difference in SSI, readmissions or reoperations between approaches. Further studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes.

Keywords: Laparoscopic; Outcomes; Quality; Surgical approach; Ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy* / methods
  • Peritoneum
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt* / adverse effects
  • Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt* / methods