Natural Alternatives to Non-biodegradable Polymers in 3D Printing of Pharmaceuticals

Curr Pharm Des. 2023;29(29):2281-2290. doi: 10.2174/0113816128259971230921111755.

Abstract

Background: Due to potential toxicity, non-biodegradable polymers used in 3D (3-dimensional) printing of drugs could be dangerous for patient safety and the environment.

Objective: This review aims to investigate the toxicity of non-biodegradable polymers and investigate the use of natural materials as an alternative in 3D printing medicines. The study evaluates the dangers connected to 3D printing.

Methods: A review of the literature on various 3D printing processes, such as inkjet printing, fused filament manufacturing, and extrusion-related 3DP systems, was done for this study. Also, the use of cellulose derivatives and natural materials in 3D printing and their potential as active excipients was proposed.

Results: The review identified potential toxicity risks linked to non-biodegradable polymers used in drug 3D printing. As a potential fix for this issue, the use of natural materials with improved mechanical and thermal properties was explored. The use of cellulose derivatives as an alternative to non-biodegradable polymers in 3D printing pharmaceuticals was also investigated in the study.

Conclusion: This study emphasises the significance of evaluating the risks connected to drug 3D printing and recommends using natural materials as an alternative to non-biodegradable polymers. More study is required to create secure and reliable 3D printing processes for pharmaceuticals.

Keywords: 3D printing technique.; Additive manufacturing; active excipient; natural materials; non-biodegradable; patient safety.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cellulose*
  • Excipients
  • Humans
  • Printing, Three-Dimensional*

Substances

  • Cellulose
  • Excipients