Abstract perceptual choice signals during action-linked decisions in the human brain

PLoS Biol. 2023 Oct 10;21(10):e3002324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002324. eCollection 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Humans can make abstract choices independent of motor actions. However, in laboratory tasks, choices are typically reported with an associated action. Consequentially, knowledge about the neural representation of abstract choices is sparse, and choices are often thought to evolve as motor intentions. Here, we show that in the human brain, perceptual choices are represented in an abstract, motor-independent manner, even when they are directly linked to an action. We measured MEG signals while participants made choices with known or unknown motor response mapping. Using multivariate decoding, we quantified stimulus, perceptual choice, and motor response information with distinct cortical distributions. Choice representations were invariant to whether the response mapping was known during stimulus presentation, and they occupied a distinct representational space from motor signals. As expected from an internal decision variable, they were informed by the stimuli, and their strength predicted decision confidence and accuracy. Our results demonstrate abstract neural choice signals that generalize to action-linked decisions, suggesting a general role of an abstract choice stage in human decision-making.

MeSH terms

  • Brain Mapping
  • Brain* / physiology
  • Choice Behavior / physiology
  • Decision Making* / physiology
  • Humans

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the European Research Council (ERC; https://erc.europa.eu/) StG 335880 and CoG 864491 (M.S), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; German Research Foundation; https://www.dfg.de/) project 276693517 (SFB 1233) (M.S.) and the Centre for Integrative Neuroscience (DFG, EXC 307) (M.S.). The authors acknowledge support by the state of Baden-Württemberg through bwHPC, by the German Research Foundation (DFG) through grant no INST 39/963-1 FUGG (bwForCluster NEMO), and by the Open Access Publishing Fund of the University of Tübingen. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.