Heresy - Is there a role for ultrasound in management of the non-palpable testicle?

Abstract

Introduction: AUA Guidelines do not support the routine use of ultrasound (US) in evaluation of boys with an undescended testicle (UDT) prior to urology referral. Multiple studies have demonstrated that real time US is inferior to a physical examination by a pediatric urologist in detecting an UDT. However, improved US technology, which now permits detection of the non-palpable testis located just proximal to the internal ring, may aid in guiding the surgical approach to the non-palpable testis. We evaluated US findings of boys deemed to have a non-palpable UDT and compared them to surgical findings.

Objective: To assess the role of pre-operative ultrasonography in guiding surgical management in boys deemed to have a non-palpable testis by a pediatric urologist.

Study design: US of boys with a non-palpable UDT, as reported by a pediatric urologist on physical exam, during a 3-year period, were reviewed. All US were performed jointly by a technician and pediatric radiologist. Patient demographics, laterality, and intra-operative findings were assessed.

Results: Thirty-one boys with a non-palpable testicle on physical exam underwent scrotal/inguinal/pelvis US at a median age of 7.5 months (IQR 2.5-12.3 months). Two patients had bilateral non-palpable testicles, 21 had a non-palpable left sided testicle and 8 had a non-palpable right sided testicle. Of the 33 non-palpable testes, 5 (15.2%) were identified in the inguinal canal. Sixteen (48.5%) were visualized in the lower pelvis just proximal to the internal ring and graded as intra-abdominal. Four (12.1%) nubbins or very atrophic testes were identified in the inguinal region or scrotum and 5 (15.2%) testes were not identified on US. Three (9.1%) testes were observed to be mobile between the lower pelvis just proximal to the internal ring and the inguinal canal. Of the 8 patients with testes that were identified in the inguinal canal, or mobile between the lower pelvis and inguinal canal, 7 avoided a diagnostic laparoscopy and underwent an inguinal orchiopexy. Of the 16 testicles located in the lower pelvis proximal to the internal ring, only 2 underwent laparoscopy/laparoscopic orchiopexy.

Discussion: In cases of a non-palpable testicle following a physical examination by a urologist, an ultrasound can impact the operative plan, and allow for patients to avoid laparoscopy. In our cohort, 87.5% of non-palpable testes avoided laparoscopic surgery after ultrasound identification of a viable testis.

Conclusions: US in the evaluation of cryptorchidism can guide surgical management in select cases in which a testis is non-palpable following careful examination by a urologist.

Keywords: Cryptorchidism; Orchiopexy; Ultrasound.