Screening peptides with good affinity is an important step in peptide-drug discovery. Recent advancement in computer and data science have made machine learning a useful tool in accurately affinitive-peptide screening. In current study, four different tree-based algorithms, including Classification and regression trees (CART), C5.0 decision tree (C50), Bagged CART (BAG) and Random Forest (RF), were employed to explore the relationship between experimental peptide affinities and virtual docking data, and the performance of each model was also compared in parallel. All four algorithms showed better performances on dataset pre-scaled, -centered and -PCA than other pre-processed dataset. After model re-built and hyperparameter optimization, the optimal C50 model (C50O) showed the best performances in terms of Accuracy, Kappa, Sensitivity, Specificity, F1, MCC and AUC when validated on test data and an unknown PEDV datasets evaluation (Accuracy=80.4 %). BAG and RFO (the optimal RF), as two best models during training process, did not performed as expecting during in testing and unknown dataset validations. Furthermore, the high correlation of the predictions of RFO and BAG to C50O implied the high stability and robustness of their prediction. Whereas although the good performance on unknown dataset, the poor performance in test data validation and correlation analysis indicated CARTO could not be used for future data prediction. To accurately evaluate the peptide affinity, the current study firstly gave a tree-model competition on affinitive peptide prediction by using virtual docking data, which would expand the application of machine learning algorithms in studying PepPIs and benefit the development of peptide therapeutics.
Keywords: affinity classification; docking data; machine learning; peptides; tree-based algorithms.
© 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH.