Assessment of Biograft-HT with I-PRF Graft in Immediate Dental Implant Placement

Arjun Singh Baghel; Pradyumna Kumar Sahoo; Jitender Sharma; Faris Jaser Almutairi; Heenal Girishbhai Adhyaru; Ritu Chhatbar; Atul Anand Bajoria

doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_178_23

Assessment of Biograft-HT with I-PRF Graft in Immediate Dental Implant Placement

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S1168-S1170. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_178_23. Epub 2023 Apr 28.

Authors

Arjun Singh Baghel¹, Pradyumna Kumar Sahoo², Jitender Sharma³, Faris Jaser Almutairi⁴, Heenal Girishbhai Adhyaru⁵, Ritu Chhatbar⁶, Atul Anand Bajoria⁷

Affiliations

¹ Department of Periodontics, Mahaveer Institute of Medical Science and Research (MIMS), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
² Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
³ Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology, Vyas Dental College and Hopistal, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
⁴ Assistant Professor, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
⁵ Senior Lecturer, Department of Periodontology, Goenka Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
⁶ Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Goenka Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
⁷ Reader, Oral Medicine and Radiology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT University, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odhisa, India.

Abstract

Objectives: This research was done to assess the efficacy of I-PRF and bone graft in immediate dental implant placement.

Materials and method: Twenty patients were selected randomly into 2 groups with 10 samples in each as Group I- using I-PRF and Group II with synthetic bone replacement alloplast (biograft-HT) after immediate implant placement. Postoperative clinical assessment after graft placement was done based on visual analog scale for pain, modified gingival index and modified plaque index at 2nd, 4th, and 6th months. A radiographic assessment of bone density was performed two and six months after the placement of the implant.

Result: There was a statistically considerable variation between the change in modified plaque index and modified gingival index. There was a statistically insignificant divergence in the mean visual analog scale between the two groups at 1, 3, and 6 days. Group I demonstrated a higher change in bone density than group II, with a statistically significant difference (P = .002).

Conclusion: An innovative, safe, and efficient method for controlling the healing process around immediate dental implants is provided by the use of I-PRF in conjunction with immediate dental implant placement.

Keywords: Graft; I-PRF; healing; implant.