Treatment of idiopathic anaphylaxis with dupilumab: a case report

Elizabeth Pepper; Luke Pittman

doi:10.1186/s13223-023-00838-8

Treatment of idiopathic anaphylaxis with dupilumab: a case report

Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2023 Sep 9;19(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13223-023-00838-8.

Authors

Elizabeth Pepper¹, Luke Pittman^{2

3}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Internal Medicine, Dwight D Eisenhower Army Medical Center, 300 E Hospital Street, Fort Gordon, GA, 30905, USA. Elizabeth.a.pepper7.mil@health.mil.
² Department of Internal Medicine, Dwight D Eisenhower Army Medical Center, 300 E Hospital Street, Fort Gordon, GA, 30905, USA.
³ Department of Allergy and Immunology, Dwight D Eisenhower Army Medical Center, 300 E Hospital Street, Fort Gordon, GA, 30905, USA.

Abstract

Background: Anaphylaxis is an acute, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction that typically occurs after exposure to a trigger, while idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA) occurs in the absence of a trigger. Acute management of both triggered anaphylaxis and IA relies on the use of epinephrine. In some patients with recurrent IA, glucocorticoid prophylaxis with prednisone can be effective. While there is currently no high quality evidence for the use of other prophylactic options to prevent recurrent IA, evolving data exists to support the consideration of biologics that target IgE or the Th2 pathway.

Case presentation: We present the case of a 28 year old female with no atopic or autoimmune history with recurrent episodes of IA since childhood occurring up to twice weekly. There was improvement in acute symptoms with administration of first or second generation antihistamines and/or intramuscular epinephrine. Without an identifiable trigger, she was diagnosed with IA and frequent idiopathic urticaria and omalizumab was added to her treatment regimen with improvement in symptom frequency. After being lost to follow up, she had recurrence of symptom frequency and severity without omalizumab therapy and subsequently presented to our institution. Her workup at this point was negative for food allergy, alpha gal syndrome, systemic mastocytosis, hereditary alpha tryptasemia, carcinoid syndrome, and pheochromocytoma, and she was trialed on dupilumab with near resolution of her symptom frequency over a six month time period.

Conclusion: Recurrent IA is a diagnosis of exclusion that is associated with high morbidity. Prophylaxis remains an area of uncertainty, although prednisone has been effective in some cases. When prednisone is contraindicated or ineffective for the prevention of IA, biologic therapies that target IgE or the Th2 pathway may present a reasonable consideration. This case adds support to the suggestion that dupilumab may be a logical off-label consideration for prophylaxis of recurrent IA. The data for dupilumab in this clinical scenario is still very limited, and further research is required before any recommendation can be made.

Keywords: Chronic spontaneous urticaria; Dupilumab; Idiopathic anaphylaxis; Mast cell activation syndrome; Omalizumab; Th2 inflammation.