Objective: The objective of this study was to summarize whether the application of additional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can change the outcomes of endovascular treatment in femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions compared with conventional angiography alone based on the existing study and evidence.
Methods: Studies published until September 2022 were searched from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases using the methods of combination of Medical Subject Headings and free text words. The outcomes included in these studies were primary patency rate or restenosis rate and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cdTLR) rate, and most studies were concerned about the 12-month results. Two independent authors conducted the process of study selection. And the pooled analysis was attempted.
Results: Finally, the inclusion criteria were met by 4 studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 3 retrospective studies) involving 1160 patients. IVUS played its role in measuring lesions and/or guiding wiring passage. Most of the included studies showed that IVUS could achieve a higher 12-month primary patency rate (from 70% to 90%) and higher 12-month freedom from cdTLR rate (from 83.9% to 94.7%) than angiography. The tentative pooled analysis also showed that IVUS significantly improved the 12-month primary patency rate (OR: 2.21, 95%CI: [1.38-3.55], p=0.001) and the 12-month freedom from cdTLR rate (OR: 1.70, 95%CI [1.04-2.78], p=0.03) compared with angiography alone.
Conclusions: Intravascular ultrasound-guided endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions may have its own advantages such as higher primary patency rate and freedom from cdTLR rate at 12 months. As a novel technology, IVUS is expected to become another beneficial option to guide clinicians performing endovascular therapy in addition to angiography and may achieve better clinical outcomes. More prospective and high-quality studies are needed in the future to investigate the role of IVUS in the process of femoropopliteal artery lesions endovascular treatment.
Clinical impact: This review summarized a few available studies to promote understanding of IVUS and reveal its potential. This novel technology shows the possibility of achieving better clinical outcomes than angiography in femoropopliteal artery lesions endovascular therapy such as higher 12-month primary patency rate shown in some studies. Currently, it is important to consider suitable technologies applied to individualized treatment. IVUS seems to provide clinicians additional option in clinical practice and benefit patients well in the future. And it needs us to conduct more high-quality studies to explore its roles and advantages in endovascular treatment.
Keywords: angiography; angioplasty; femoropopliteal artery; intravascular ultrasound; peripheral arterial disease.