Sweeteners in Brazilian processed foods and beverages: prevalence, profile and concomitant addition of sugars and nutritional claims

Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2023 Oct;40(10):1285-1297. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2023.2255291. Epub 2023 Sep 8.

Abstract

Brazil is experiencing an increased prevalence of overweight and obesity. To overcome these health problems, several strategies have been implemented, including incentives to reduce sugar intake and new packaging labeling. This has promoted an increase in the use of low or non-caloric sweeteners (LNCS). In this study, the use of LNCS in six Brazilian food groups (non-alcoholic beverages, dairy products, baked goods, confectionery, cereals, and condiments) was investigated through label declarations. Three supermarkets were visited in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Ten out of the 16 LNCS allowed by the Brazilian legislation were declared. Altogether, among the 441 products included, 17.7% contained at least one LNCS, with an average of 2.21 LNCS per sweetened product. Non-alcoholic beverages (37.2%) and dairy products (29.5%) had the highest LNCS occurrence. Combinations of two, three, four, and seven LNCS were found. Artificial sweeteners represented 87.8% of the declared LNCS, with a higher prevalence of acesulfame-K, followed by cyclamate, and sucralose, respectively. Meanwhile, 53.9% of 78 products containing LNCS also had added sugars, and 70.5% used nutritional claims about reduced sugars and/or calories. This scenario highlights the importance of continuous monitoring of LNCS in foods and beverages as front-of-package labeling is not fully implemented yet.

Keywords: Additives; food labeling; low and non-caloric sweeteners; sucralose; sugar.

MeSH terms

  • Beverages / analysis
  • Brazil
  • Food Labeling
  • Food, Processed
  • Non-Nutritive Sweeteners* / analysis
  • Prevalence
  • Sugars
  • Sweetening Agents* / analysis

Substances

  • Sweetening Agents
  • Sugars
  • Non-Nutritive Sweeteners