The efficient operation of metal-ion batteries in harsh environments, such as at temperatures below -20 °C or at high charge/discharge rates required for EV applications, calls for a careful selection of electrode materials. In this study, we report advantages associated with the solid solution (de)intercalation over the two-phase (de)intercalation pathway and identify the main sources of performance limitations originating from the two mechanisms. To isolate the (de)intercalation pathway as the main variable, we focused on two cathode materials for Na-ion batteries: a recently developed KTiOPO4-type NaVPO4F and a well-studied Na3V2(PO4)2F3. These materials have the same elemental composition, operate within the same potential range, and demonstrate very close ionic diffusivities, yet follow different (de)intercalation routes. To avoid any interpretation uncertainties, we obtained these materials in the form of particles with merely identical morphology and size. A detailed electrochemical study revealed a much lower capacity and energy density retention for phase-transforming Na3V2(PO4)2F3 compared to NaVPO4F, which exhibits a single-phase behavior over a wide range of Na concentrations. The reasons for the inferior rate capability and temperature tolerance for the phase-separating Na3V2(PO4)2F3 material should be affiliated with slow phase boundary propagation. We hope that the comprehensive information on limiting factors provided for both mechanisms is useful for the further optimization of electrode materials toward a new generation of high-power and low-temperature metal-ion batteries.
Keywords: battery kinetics; high-power metal-ion batteries; low-temperature metal-ion batteries; phase boundary propagation; phase transition; sodium-ion battery; solid solution.