Background: In previous years, students expressed their concerns regarding the high-stress nature of the summative skills checkoff, and pass rates were not as high as expected.
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of mini-skills checkoff assessments and the use of standardized patients (SPs) on summative skills pass rates and nursing students' perceptions of this teaching approach.
Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used with a convenience sample of 46 sophomore nursing students.
Results: There was a significant difference in the summative skills checkoff pass rates after including mini-skills checkoffs and SPs ( P < .01). Four dominant themes emerged: emotional impact, preparation and learning, confidence and competence, and readiness.
Conclusions: Evidence from this pilot study suggests the inclusion of continuous, low-stakes assessments over time, with learner feedback bridges the gap between clinical practice, simulation, and classroom learning.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.