Listening evaluation of cochlear implant users: comparison of subjective and objective evaluation by visual analogue scale

J Laryngol Otol. 2024 Mar;138(3):297-300. doi: 10.1017/S0022215123001445. Epub 2023 Aug 30.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to use short-form visual analogue scale cochlear implantation questionnaires to evaluate subjective aspects at each out-patient visit. The correlation between subjective hearing tests using the short-form visual analogue scale and objective hearing outcomes was evaluated.

Method: This study was conducted in a single centre. Cochlear implant users (n = 199) evaluated their hearing on a scale of 0 to 100 for the right, left and both ears. The Japanese speech perception test (CI-2004) Japanese monosyllable speech perception test (67-S) and cochlear implantation threshold were used for the objective cochlear implantation evaluation.

Results: A significant correlation was found between the short-form visual analogue scale questionnaire and objective hearing outcome, for words (r = 0.64) and sentences (r = 0.62) in CI-2004 and 67-S (r = 0.56) tests. No significant correlation was found between the short-form visual analogue scale score and cochlear implantation threshold (r = -0.18).

Conclusion: Short-form visual analogue scale cochlear implantation questionnaires mean cochlear implant users spend less time answering subjective visual analogue scale questionnaires, and clinicians estimate a patient's cochlear implantation hearing and abnormality by chronological evaluation.

Keywords: Cochlear implant; visual analogue scale.

MeSH terms

  • Cochlear Implantation*
  • Cochlear Implants*
  • Hearing
  • Humans
  • Speech Perception*
  • Visual Analog Scale